DeePCG: constructing coarse-grained models via deep neural networks. L Zhang, J Han, H Wang, R Car, Weinan E. arXiv:1802.08549v2 [physics.chem-ph]
Contributed by Jesper Madsen
The idea of “learning” a molecular force field (FF) using neural networks can be traced back to Blank et al. in 1995.[1] Modern variations (reviewed recently by Behler[2]), such as the DeePCG scheme[3] that I highlight here, seem to have two key innovations to set them apart from earlier work: network depth and atomic environment descriptors. The latter was the topic of my recent highlight and Zhang et al.[3] take advantage of similar ideas.
Contributed by Jesper Madsen
The idea of “learning” a molecular force field (FF) using neural networks can be traced back to Blank et al. in 1995.[1] Modern variations (reviewed recently by Behler[2]), such as the DeePCG scheme[3] that I highlight here, seem to have two key innovations to set them apart from earlier work: network depth and atomic environment descriptors. The latter was the topic of my recent highlight and Zhang et al.[3] take advantage of similar ideas.
 |
| Figure 1: “Schematic plot of the neural network input for the environment of CG particle i, using water as an example. Red and white balls represent the oxygen and the hydrogen atoms of the microscopic system, respectively. Purple balls denote CG particles, which, in our example, are centered at the positions of the oxygens.)” from ref. [3] |
Zhang et al. simulate liquid water using ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) on
the DFT/PBE0 level of theory in order to train a coarse-grained (CG) molecular
water model. The training is done by a standard protocol used in CGing where
mean forces are fitted by minimizing a loss-function (the natural choice is the
residual sum of squares) over the sampled configurations. CGing liquid water is
difficult because of the necessity of many-body contributions to interactions,
especially so upon integrating out degrees-of-freedom. One would therefore
expect that a FF capable of capturing such many-body effects to perform well,
just as DeePCG does, and I think this is a very nice example of exactly how
much can be gained by using faithful representations of atomic neighborhoods
instead of radially symmetric pair potentials. Recall that traditional
force-matching, while provably exact in the limit of the complete many-body
expansion,[4] still shows non-negligible deviations from the target distributions
for most simple liquids when standard approximations are used.
FF transferability, however, is likely where the current
grand challenge is to be found. Zhang et al. remark that it would be convenient
to have an accurate yet cheap (e.g., CG) model for describing phase transitions
in water. They do not attempt this in the current preprint paper, but I suspect
that it is not *that* easy to
make a decent CG model that can correctly get subtle long-range correlations
right at various densities, let alone different phases of water and ice,
coexistences, interfaces, impurities (non-water moieties), etc. Machine-learnt
potentials continuously demonstrate excellent accuracy over the
parameterization space of states or configurations, but for transferability and
extrapolations, we are still waiting to see how far they can get.
References
[1] Neural network
models of potential energy surfaces. TB Blank, SD Brown, AW Calhoun, DJ
Doren. J Chem Phys 103, 4129 (1995)
[2] Perspective:
Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations. J Behler. J Chem Phys 145, 170901 (2016)
[3] DeePCG:
constructing coarse-grained models via deep neural networks. L Zhang, J
Han, H Wang, R Car, Weinan E. arXiv:1802.08549v2
[physics.chem-ph]
[4] The multiscale
coarse-graining method. I. A rigorous bridge between atomistic and
coarse-grained models. WG Noid, J-W Chu, GS Ayton, V Krishna, S Izvekov, GA
Voth, A Das, HC Andersen. J Chem Phys
128, 244114 (2008)
